The advent of Twitter roused little curiosity in corporate communication circles until savvy consumers started taking aim at brands for bad service and poor products. As social media platforms transform into business tools and applications, business leaders are taking note and integrating strategies and platforms into company strategy plans.
The reason is quite simple: Customer connectivity. As digital platforms become the preferred consumer communication platform, businesses are forced to follow their customers online. And by connecting with clients and customers online businesses must deal with the good, the bad and the ugly.
A case study example noted in the book Digital Strategies for Powerful Corporate Communications (McGraw-Hill 2009) demonstrates how quickly corporate ad messaging can translate into miscommunication and push back: A Johnson & Johnson ad meant to introduce mothers of newborn toddlers to its Motrin pain relief product as a cure-all from a stressful day for trendy moms that carry their children.
The ad soon found its way to the Web, appearing on YouTube and Twitter as angry Moms began forwarding the video and blogging about it – even going so far as to set up a Twitter page “MotrinMoms” – in outrage over the ads insensitivity for comparing their children to fashionable “arm candy.”
The fallout was a humbling moment for J&J, which later admitted to the mistake and its inability to respond in a meaningful way. J&J’s ad agency wasn’t even aware of the Twitter and YouTube backlash; however the wake up call proved a valuable lesson for the venerable company that has seen crisis before, learned and moved on in a forward thinking fashion. J&J is now one of the leading standards by which digital communications strategies are measured.
And for businesses wavering on the sidelines waiting for the other shoe to drop – its has. Last week, a Manhattan Supreme Court decision sided with a consumer for blog posts complaining about a finance course offered by the Swiss Finance Academy, according to the New York Law Journal. The Court found that the blog posts by a former student , which claimed that the Academy was a “bait and switch company” after he was expelled for what the Academy deemed was for the student’s rude and insulting behavior to staff member and for failure to pay tuition, were not defamatory in nature.
The former student denied posting such complaints to www.ripoffreport.com. However, he argued that even so, such speech was protected speech. The court agreed, stating such speech was “subjective expression of consumer dissatisfaction,” and thus not actionable because they were personal opinion. Further, the court found that the website owned by Xcentric Ventures was protected under federal law by the Communications Decency Act and therefore not liable.
Any questions comments or concerns – leave them at www.twitter.com/ThinkComLLC